
I do not often miss meetings of the Hamilton Southeastern (HSE) School Board, but after missing Tuesday night’s session, it was clear from the discussion that some board members believe they are not receiving financial information in a timely manner—while Superintendent Patrick Mapes strongly disagrees, insisting the district is more transparent now than under the previous administration.
The disagreement surfaced during what is typically a routine agenda item: a review of district finances required annually by state law. While little new financial information was presented, board member Suzanne Thomas used the opportunity to read a prepared statement.
Thomas praised the district’s finance staff but expressed concern about the timing and presentation of information provided to the board.
“My concern is not that information is being withheld,” Thomas said. “It is that the timing and framing of the information may not be giving the board the opportunity to provide proactive oversight. As a board, our role is not to manage finances—we do not get into the weeds—but it is important to anticipate risk, ask questions early, and understand trends before they become urgent.”
Superintendent Mapes responded sharply, saying he took Thomas’ comments personally.
“We’re as transparent as the place has ever been before,” Mapes said. “And so I take offense to the comment, because the comment is directed at me.”
Thomas replied that her statement was not directed at Mapes personally, but rather at the overall financial reporting process.
Board member Dawn Lang voiced her support for the current process and said she disagreed with Thomas’ assessment.
Board member Latricia Schooley said she took issue with the tone of the superintendent’s response, while also acknowledging the work of the district’s finance staff.
“But what’s not in those reports are contracts that just disappear, like $240,000 to a broker,” Schooley said. “That was not commission. So there are things that are not presented, such as vendor relationships. That is coming from the top down. I expect, in the future, when our administration addresses the board, they do so in a respectful manner.”
Board member Sarah Parks Reese said concerns raised by some members about policy should be addressed and also said she had issues with the tone of comments made to the board.
Schooley added that she has made what she described as simple requests for information that were denied, noting that such requests could be verified through public records requests.
The disagreement over financial transparency was one of several signs of growing divisions on the seven-member board.
Earlier in the meeting, board member Juanita Albright proposed an amendment to board policy that would eliminate compensation for board members attending meetings. The proposal failed on a 4–3 vote, with Ben Orr, Suzanne Thomas, Latricia Schooley, and Sarah Parks Reese voting against the change.
Albright has recently filed as a candidate for an Indiana State Senate seat.