
Whether you support or oppose the death penalty, we should be honest about what it requires: the government deliberately ending a human life. In my view, there is no humane way to do that.
Tennessee has supplied another disturbing reason to confront that reality.
On Sept. 30, the state attempted to execute Christa Pike, convicted of torturing and killing 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer in 1995. Pike survived two doses of pentobarbital. Witnesses described continued breathing, snoring sounds and complaints of arm pain. She was taken to a hospital.
As of Oct. 4, Pike remained unconscious and on a ventilator, according to her lawyer. Her prognosis remained uncertain.
The precise failure still requires investigation. Tennessee officials said they followed their protocol. Gov. Bill Lee halted the remaining scheduled execution for 2026 and ordered an independent review. On Oct. 3, he announced that corrections Commissioner Frank Strada would step down this month.
Reaction reflects both outrage and enduring grief. Tennessee’s Catholic and Episcopal bishops urged Lee to commute Pike’s sentence. Slemmer’s mother, May Martinez, told the AP she had not received justice for her daughter. Her suffering deserves acknowledgment in any discussion of this case.
The response has crossed borders. Amnesty International condemned the attempt and called for commutation. Its German leadership renewed its demand for worldwide abolition, arguing that lethal injection offers no humane execution method.
Here in Indiana, another concern is how much the public is permitted to see.
Indiana and Wyoming bar journalists from attending executions as designated press witnesses. Indiana allows an exception when an inmate invites a reporter as a guest. That is no substitute for dependable, independent press access.
I have never witnessed an execution. I know reporters who have. Suffice it to say, it is not easy for anyone to witness. That difficulty makes their work essential. When government exercises its ultimate power, citizens need more than an official announcement that the prisoner is dead.
Indiana, like Tennessee, has used pentobarbital in executions. Over the years, a growing list of pharmaceutical companies has acted to prevent its medicines from reaching execution chambers. Pfizer, for example, restricts distribution of certain drugs and explicitly objects to their use in capital punishment.
The distinction matters: medicines developed to preserve life are being enlisted to end it. A clinical setting and a syringe cannot settle the moral question.
Nothing about that argument diminishes a murder victim’s life or excuses the person responsible. Society must protect the public and hold killers accountable.
But if you favor the death penalty, understand what you are supporting. Understand the restraints, the drugs, the witnesses and the possibility of prolonged suffering. Even when the procedure goes as planned, the state has intentionally killed a human being.
There is no humane way to execute a human being.