Defining microaggression

The meaning of words matters, so when the term “microaggression” is used in a student handbook, the meaning of that term does attach importance.

Two assistant principals, Kyle Goodwin of Fishers High School and Zak Tschiniak of HSE High School, reviewed proposed student handbook changes with the Hamilton Southeastern (HSE) School Board Tuesday morning.

The board had wrestled in the past with a definition of microaggression.  The proposed high school student handbook language says the following:

Microaggressions can be defined as everyday, subtle, intentional or unintentional interactions or behaviors that communicate some sort of bias toward historically marginalized groups. While Hamilton Southeastern High School understands those individuals communicating a microaggression might not intend to express bias, the school recognizes the responsibility to educate students on the reality of bias perceptions. Issues regarding microaggressions may be addressed through restorative conversations led by school administration and/or guidance counselors rather than punitive measures. Habitual occurrences could lead to consequences applicable to inappropriate conduct as defined in Section 28 (another section of the handbook).

When asked how to define habitual, the administrators responded that it would depend on the context of the situation with that particular student.

“I don’t really have a problem with microaggressions,” said board member Brad Boyer.  “I just want to say that…I think it can be divisive.”

There are a number of other proposed changes to the handbook.  Here are a few presented to the board:

–Food delivery services ordered by students would not be allowed entry into the school building.

–An entire section would be added dealing with virtual students.

–Keeping track of students tardiness has created a proposed change in how to handle this.  Instead of tracking tardies per class/period, administrators are proposing a shift to cumulative tardies across all classes.

–Air pods and headphones would not be used unless allowed by a teacher or other school official.  Also, the following passage would be added – “No picture taking or video recording is permitted in locker rooms or restrooms.”

–The student dress code would have the following language, saying students are “expected to maintain an appearance that is appropriate for school and conducive to the
educational atmosphere.”  The proposal would delete the reference to bare midriffs, brimmed hats and hooded clothing as inappropriate.

–The prohibition of photographing or recording other students or school personnel would be extended to school buses.  Added is the following language – “Students may not use
any device to record themselves or other students violating school policies, and students may not disseminate recordings of such content.”

–There are several proposed changes in the athletic eligibility section of the handbook.

These are proposed changes that will come back to the board for action at a regular board session.

You can read the document presented to the board with changes highlighted in yellow at this link. 

 

 

One thought on “Defining microaggression

  1. I find the prohibition on imaging–both still and motion–to be troubling. There are many valid reasons why a student might want or even need to do so. Having a blanked rule with no exceptions and the usual “zero tolerance” response from the administration will do more harm than good.

    For example, let’s say a child being bullied and no one reported it. The student would be prohibited from recording the bully to provide evidence of the behavior. The same goes for bad behavior of staff or faculty.

    Not allowing recording will only allow the school to hide more bad behavior and punish those who would work to correct it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.